Sportstatic

Sportstatic: Where Every Game Comes to Life.

Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders match player stats

Dalton, Thomas dominate on Friday night in Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders match player stats | NFL India. Player stats, team comparison: Full Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders match player stats including passing, rushing, receiving, team comparison and game individual turning points.

The Bears won, 40โ€“20, in a runaway.

๐Ÿˆ Game Overview

Category Details
Matchup Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders
Final Score Bears 40 โ€“ Commanders 20
Venue FedExField
Total Points 60
Game Type Regular Season

The Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders match player stats show a rejuvenated offensive display from the home side, particularly in the passing game.

Chicago Bears Player Stats

๐Ÿง  Quarterback Analysis โ€“ Justin Fields

Stat Numbers
Completions / Attempts 15 / 29
Passing Yards 282
Touchdowns 4
Interceptions 0
Passer Rating 125+

Justin Fields turned in one of his better performances of the season. His four touchdowns and no turnovers were key in the Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders player stats.

He showed poise, taking deep shots down the field while dictating play most of the contest.

๐Ÿƒ Bears Rushing Leaders

Player Carries Yards Average
Khalil Herbert 10 76 7.6
Justin Fields 7 57 8.1
Roschon Johnson 6 32 5.3

Chicago kept its offensive balance, combining rushing and passing to keep Washingtonโ€™s defense on its heels.

๐ŸŽฏ Bears Receiving Leaders

Player Receptions Yards TD
DJ Moore 8 230 3
Cole Kmet 5 42 1
Darnell Mooney 2 25 0

DJ Moore had a 230-yard, three-touchdown performance, dominating the receiving stats and changing the game early.

Washington Commanders Player Stats

๐Ÿง  Quarterback Performance โ€“ Sam Howell

Stat Numbers
Completions / Attempts 37 / 51
Passing Yards 388
Touchdowns 2
Interceptions 1
Sacks Taken 5

Sam Howell had big-yardage games, but heavy defensive pressure limited his overall impact.

The Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders match player stats highlight this defensive influence.

๐Ÿƒ Commanders Rushing Leaders

Player Carries Yards Average
Brian Robinson Jr. 10 31 3.1
Antonio Gibson 5 21 4.2

Washington struggled to generate consistent rushing yards.

๐ŸŽฏ Commanders Receiving Leaders

Player Receptions Yards TD
Terry McLaurin 8 86 0
Logan Thomas 9 77 1
Curtis Samuel 6 65 1

Despite solid individual performances, turnovers and pressure from Chicagoโ€™s defensive line affected scoring.

Team Comparison Summary

Category Bears Commanders
Total Yards 451 440
Passing Yards 282 388
Rushing Yards 169 52
Turnovers 0 1
Sacks 5 1

Chicagoโ€™s balanced offense and pressure on defense made the difference despite Washingtonโ€™s strong passing numbers.

Defensive Highlights

Chicago Defense:

  • Five sacks

  • One interception

  • Strong third-down stops

Washington Defense:

  • Limited Chicago rushing touchdowns

  • Struggled to stop deep passes

Defensive performance was a key factor in the Chicago Bears v Washington Commanders match player stats outcome.

Key Game Moments

  • DJ Mooreโ€™s opening touchdown paved the way.

  • Chicago established a dominant halftime lead.

  • Washington attempted a second-half comeback.

  • Chicago defense maintained constant pressure.

All of these moments are clearly shown in the Chicago Bears v Washington Commanders match player stats.

Chicago Bears vs San Francisco 49ers Match Player Stats โ€“ Full Breakdown

Final Analysis

The Chicago Bears dominated through offensive efficiency and defensive strength. Justin Fields threw four touchdown passes without turnovers, while DJ Moore had explosive receiving stats.

Despite Sam Howellโ€™s high passing yardage, Washington was unbalanced offensively and lacked defensive pressure.

Chicago Bears v Washington Commanders match player stats confirm that a balanced offense with disciplined defense can secure high-scoring wins.

Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Official Game Page


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *